Audi vs. Cupra – Two 2.5-liter fives: who is better?


The same engine, the same gearbox, the same mufflers – Audi and Cupra still have some differences.
Audi more willing to compromise
The firing order 1-2-4-5-3 says it all: Sometimes two cylinders close together fire, sometimes far apart. The result is a pulsating sound with a smoky heavy drinker timbre, somewhere between Joe Cocker and Lemmy Kilmister in their heyday. And the sounds don’t come from sound generators, they’re real!

The fascination of these two SUVs lies in five cylinders.
Even the acceleration test shows that the Audi is more willing to compromise, the gear changes seem smoother, less brutal than the Cupra. Its standard torque splitter also locks the rear axle mechanically. It rattles slightly from behind and the rear wheels bite into the asphalt. However, the system is heat-sensitive and occasionally requires cooling breaks.
Engine type/cylinder
installation position
valves/camshafts
camshaft drive
displacement
kW (hp) at rpm
Nm at rpm
top speed
transmission
drive
Brakes front/rear
test car tires
tire type
wheel size
Exhaust gas CO2
Consumption*
tank capacity
fuel type
particle filter
pass-by noise
trailer load used/unused
drawbar load
trunk volume
Length Width Height
wheelbase
basic price
Test car price (is evaluated)
MEASUREMENTS
Acceleration 0-50km/h
0-100km/h
0-130km/h
0-160km/h
0-200km/h
Intermediate sprint 60-100 km/h
80-120km/h
curb weight/load
Weight distribution v./h.
Turning circle left/right
seat height
Braking distance from 100 km/h cold/warm
warm from 200 km/h
Interior noise at 50 km/h
at 100 km/h
at 130 km/h
saving consumption
test consumption
Average of the 155 km test lap (deviation from the WLTP specification)
sports consumption
CO2 (test consumption)
Range (test consumption)
Only the Spaniard has the torque splitter. A supplier part from Magna, which replaces the SUV-usual four-wheel drive clutch in front of the rear axle differential with two transversely placed multi-plate clutches, one in front of each side shaft. Advantage: Now, electronically controlled, each rear wheel can be given individual power.
Drifting eats up time
It also allows for fun things like Drift mode, which, in a reversal of the usual method, allocates more power to the outside wheel. In the case of the front-wheel drive-based Cupra, it is not the front that pushes, but the rear to the outside of the curve.

The RS Q3 brake (right) is up to the power, the Cupra is braked by snappy six-piston brakes from Akebono with 375 discs.
It is above all this component that makes the Formentor VZ5 stand out on the hairpin bends of the Contidrom handling course. Here the Audi slows down its tendency to understeer as well as the safety-oriented residual function of its ESP, which drives the transmission into parade when accelerating out of a tight corner, which first has to sort itself out and then literally starves the driver in too high a gear.
Which likes to cost a full second. Of course, the RS Q3 remains an absurdly fast car with a high level of grip. However, that costs fun, while the Formentor happily lets the rear come. If you want to be really fast with the Spaniard (built in Martorell), you should say goodbye to drift mode – drifting eats up time.

Both are unreasonable – but the Cupra is more consistent.
In the Cupra program, the torque splitter now reduces torque on the rear wheel on the outside of the curve, which literally carries the Spaniard through the curve, neutral to slightly oversteering.
Both can everyday
As different as the two are: They can do everyday things, the remaining comfort of the spring-damper setup is acceptable.
body
quality
Seats/sitting position
Furnishing
engine characteristics
mileage
transmission/shifting
sound
driving comfort
driving safety
handling
lap times
steering
brakes
Entertains
consumption
Price
rating
1. Cupra Formentor VZ5: 296 points
Trackday-suitable athlete with superior all-wheel drive technology. At a lower price, that ensures victory here.
2. Audi RS Q3: 286 points
Inferior on the circuit, superior in everyday life. But it’s difficult to justify the 10,000 euro price difference.