Cars

Karoq vs. Tucson: Which hide is in top form?

Freshly made up – and yet everyone is looking next door. The newly revised Skoda Karoq does not have it easy today. Because for the first comparison he has to run against the Hyundai Tucson.

And when the two stand next to each other – sorry for Mladá Boleslav – we spontaneously think of a conservative and an arsonist. So purely optical.

The facelift on the Karoq is essentially limited to the wider radiator grille, which is now hexagonal in its basic form, with vertical double ribs and new light units that are narrower at the front and smaller overall at the rear. Fine work on the air intake and on the roof edge spoiler lower the drag coefficient to 0.30. That’s it.

Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq

Only connoisseurs notice the latest facelift for the Skoda Karoq, while the current Hyundai Tucson is noticeable to everyone.


On the other hand, the still fresh Korean looks almost wild, looks much more confidently into the car world with a large grill and interestingly staged headlights. The looks so clearly belong to the Tucson, but what about the points?

They offer: Hyundai bigger, Skoda more flexible

The Tucson consistently converts its eleven centimeters more length into space advantage. Both at the front and at the back, it offers that touch more air that makes the guests smile even more relaxed.

Although the atmosphere in the Karoq is by no means bad, there is noticeably less freedom of movement in the rear, especially for long legs – despite the longitudinally sliding bench seat.

Skoda Karoq

The virtual cockpit of the Karoq no longer costs any extra with the facelift. The Columbus infotainment system with a screen diagonal of 9.2 inches costs 1290 euros extra.


However, it will prove to be a good investment the next time you move, because it can also be completely expanded. Although there is no double floor and there is always a step in the luggage compartment, it then swallows up to 1810 liters – the Tucson, which is flatter towards the rear, already reports that the luggage compartment is fully occupied at 1725 liters.

And we just sit a bit more comfortably in the Czech. The front cushions offer a firmer support and support better, at the back we enjoy 15 millimeters more seat height above the floor.

junction

Engine type/cylinder

junction

junction

installation position

junction

junction

Valves/camshaft drive

junction

junction

displacement

junction

junction

Power at 1/min

junction

junction

Torque at 1/min

junction

junction

suspension

junction

junction

tire size/tyre type

junction

junction

transmission

junction

junction

All-wheel drive/power distribution v:h

junction

junction

terrain reduction

junction

junction

traction aids

junction

junction

Brakes front/rear

junction

junction

trunk volume

junction

junction

Trailer load braked/unbraked

junction

junction

drawbar load

junction

junction

top speed

junction

junction

speed at 130 km/h

junction

junction

pass-by noise

junction

junction

standard consumption; Standard CO2 emissions

junction

junction

Tank capacity/fuel type

junction

junction

SCR catalytic converter/AdBlue tank content

junction

Four-cylinder, turbo diesel + RSG

4 per cylinder/belt

100 kW (136 hp) at 4000 rpm + RSG 12 kW (16 hp)

Single wheel/ coil springs

235/50 R 19 W/ Continental Premium Contact 6

7-speed dual-clutch automatic

semi-permanent via el. Multi-plate clutch/100:0–50:50

el. brake intervention v. + h.

180 km/h at 3400 rpm (7th gear)

Four-cylinder, turbo diesel

4 per cylinder/belt

110 kW (150 hp) at 3000 rpm

Single wheel/ coil springs

225/50 R 18 W/ Bridgestone Turanza T005

7-speed dual-clutch automatic

semi-permanent via el. Multi-plate clutch/100:0–50:50

el. brake intervention v. + h.

201 km/h at 3825 rpm (6th gear)


At first glance, the pilot is offered the usual modern cockpit: digital instruments, large touch monitor, no volume control. As always, the differences are in the details.

The Hyundai is a little more confusing because it has an enormous number of buttons on the steering wheel and also controls the climate via touch. In addition, mobile phones can only be paired when stationary, and the navigation display in the instruments only uses arrows.

The automatic air conditioning and seat heating/ventilation can also be changed by voice command – albeit rather roughly and not always at the first attempt.

Hyundai Tucson

As with the Skoda, materials in the Tucson are good in the field of vision, and then noticeably simpler underneath.


Skoda still relies on manual rotary controls for the climate, with “Okay Laura” you can only select navigation destinations or radio stations, statements like “I’m hungry” lead to a list of restaurants, as with the Hyundai.

When navigating the Skoda shows clear advantages. A large, zoomable map guides you in the instrument display, and those who prefer to use their smartphone can connect it wirelessly (while driving).

How they drive: Skoda always at the top

The well-known and popular 2.0 TDI also delivers a convincing performance in the Karoq. Yes, like the Tucson, it sounds a lot like a taxi, especially when cold, but otherwise there is little to complain about.

junction

Acceleration 0-50km/h

junction

junction

0-100km/h

junction

junction

0-130km/h

junction

junction

0-160km/h

junction

junction

0-200km/h

junction

junction

Intermediate sprint 60-100 km/h

junction

junction

80-120km/h

junction

junction

trunk length

junction

junction

Trunk width/height

junction

junction

Turning circle left/right

junction

junction

Braking distance from 100 km/h cold

junction

junction

from 100 km/h warm

junction

junction

Interior noise at 50 km/h

junction

junction

at 100km/h

junction

junction

at 130/160 km/h

junction

junction

saving consumption

junction

junction

Test consumption Average of the 155 km test lap (deviation from the WLTP specification)

junction

junction

sports consumption

junction

junction

CO2 (test consumption)

junction

junction

Range (test consumption)

junction

6.5 l D/100 km (+10%)


The 150 hp ensure more than decent performance – and a huge lead over the 14 hp weaker Hyundai. With its 1.6 liter, it is more comfortable and cannot keep up, especially on the freeway, but despite the 48-volt mild hybrid, it consumes 0.4 liters more than the Czech.

Both show great composure in everyday life thanks to the seven-speed double clutch and all-wheel drive, and with careful ESP tactics nothing can burn even in the limit area.

When braking, the Tucson is half a class snappier, stands 1.6 meters earlier with cold discs and 0.5 meters earlier than the Karoq with a warm system. But the Skoda knows how to implement steering corrections with better feedback.

Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq

You can’t go wrong with these two compact SUVs.


However, the soft suspension of the Skoda swallows nasty road errors even more casually, albeit with clearly noticeable body movements.

They cost: Hyundai top only with the guarantee

The Koreans trust their Tucson for a full five years, Skoda its Karoq only two – why actually? Apart from that, Hyundai has no advantages here, the Czech Skoda is even cheaper when it comes to purchase and tax/insurance. Who needs bright makeup?

1. Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 4×4: 638 points
2. Hyundai Tucson 1.6 CRDi: 615 points

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button