Cars

Kia Sportage vs. Opel Grandland: A comparison of plug-in hybrid SUVs

Hurry before it’s too late. Plug-in hybrids are threatened with the end of the environmental bonus, the traffic light could change to red from 2023. This year, however, the funding pot is still full, with a discount of up to 7177.50 euros (including tax).

There are for the fresh Kia Sportage plug-in hybrid; the Opel Grandland Hybrid4 still gets a discount of 5981.25 euros because of the higher base price. So are the double hearts with a plug worth it? The comparison clarifies that – not only in financial terms, but also in all other matters.

Vattenfall wall boxes

Vattenfall Wallbox

Vattenfall wallbox + green electricity

Vattenfall charging packages including inexpensive wall boxes with a hardware bonus: Charge Amps Halo™ from 299 euros

In co-operation with

Vattenfall logo


Four centimeters make the small but subtle difference here. In every dimension (length/width/height), the Sportage stretches four centimeters further than the Grandland – and you can tell that on the inside.

Kia Sportage Opel Grandland

The Sportage then appears to be a little more bold in design, while the Grandland has a sympathetic exterior.


The passengers sit a little more airy in the front and rear, taller guests do not often reach their limits and can load between 150 and 187 liters more luggage. In the rear we also enjoy two centimeters more leg height and a tilt-adjustable backrest – in the Opel you sit very upright, which is no fun on long journeys.

And while we’re complaining: The rear side windows on the Opel don’t completely disappear into the door, a few centimeters of the glass always remain. Small thing, but annoying. Like the loading sill on the inside of the Opel trunk (like Kia with a lot of scratch-sensitive hard plastic) or the floor that rises significantly after folding the rear backrest.
Kia Sportage

The 1.6 in the Kia delivers 180 hp, the electric motor controls a further 91 hp, four-wheel drive via hydraulic multi-plate clutch.


Mini-advantage Opel then also with the navigation. The map can be called up in full format in the digital instruments, the driver does not have to look at the central screen. In the Sportage instruments, which are also digital, the pilot is dependent on directional arrows.

junction

Engine type/cylinder

junction

junction

performance of the combustion engine

junction

junction

Installation position/displacement

junction

junction

Peak performance electric motor(s)

junction

junction

system torque

junction

junction

system performance

junction

junction

top speed

junction

junction

transmission

junction

junction

drive

junction

junction

Brakes front/rear

junction

junction

test car tires

junction

junction

tire type

junction

junction

wheel size

junction

junction

Exhaust gas CO2*

junction

junction

Consumption*

junction

junction

Tank capacity/battery capacity

junction

junction

Fuel cap/charging port

junction

junction

fuel grade

junction

junction

charging power

junction

junction

pass-by noise

junction

junction

trailer load used/unused

junction

junction

drawbar load

junction

junction

trunk volume

junction

junction

Length Width Height

junction

junction

wheelbase

junction

junction

Basic price (before funding)

junction

junction

Test car price (is evaluated)

junction

Four-cylinder, turbo, + electric motor

132 kW (180 hp) at 5500 rpm

rear left/rear right

Super/electric power

Four-cylinder, turbo, + 2 electric motors

147 kW (200 hp) at 6000 rpm

v. 81 kW (110 HP)/h. 83 kW (113 hp)

rear right/rear left

Super/electric current


Otherwise, however, the Kia system looks more modern, understands freely formulated instructions better and can also activate the seat heating/ventilation with words. Opel has to fit in there, and when it comes to navigation destinations, it also asks for the street first and then the location.

Hardly any differences then in the processing quality. Both compact SUVs are neatly put together and hardly creak even on bad roads. Outside of the field of vision, however, the plastics feel simpler – both in the Opel and in the Kia.

The Opel Grandland drives much more light-footed and committed

The interaction of petrol engine and electric motor works completely unobtrusively and smoothly in both plug-ins, the change can only be heard, not felt. Thanks to 13 percent more power (300 to 265 hp), the Opel is much more light-footed and committed to work, gets a two-second advantage up to 100 km/h and runs at 235 km/h on the autobahn – the Sportage only manages 191 km/h.

Opel Grandland

The Opel also has a 1.6 turbo, here with 200 hp. In addition, the front electric motor has 110 hp and the rear has 113 hp. All-wheel electric.


But basically the plug-in SUVs are not good for sports anyway, the small battery (Opel 13.2 / Kia 13.8 kWh) is quickly empty, and then it gets thirsty. So it’s better to take it easy and manage the electricity supplies intelligently. In the test, the Kia managed at least 60 kilometers without a combustion engine, can be charged with 7.2 kW as standard, but weakens when recuperating.

If you want to charge more intensively using the engine brake, you have to select the Eco driving mode. The Opel, on the other hand, can recuperate more in every driving profile because it knows the driving position “B”. However, the 7.4 kW charger at Opel costs 500 euros extra and the 300 hp Grandland only has an electric range of 50 kilometers.

junction

Acceleration 0-50km/h

junction

junction

0-100km/h

junction

junction

0-130km/h

junction

junction

0-160km/h

junction

junction

Intermediate sprint 60-100 km/h

junction

junction

80-120km/h

junction

junction

curb weight/load

junction

junction

Weight distribution v./h.

junction

junction

Turning circle left/right

junction

junction

seat height

junction

junction

Braking distance from 100 km/h cold

junction

junction

from 100 km/h warm

junction

junction

Interior noise at 50 km/h

junction

junction

at 100 km/h

junction

junction

at 130 km/h

junction

junction

Power consumption (extrapolated)

junction

junction

Test consumption (60% hybrid, 40% electric share)

junction

junction

consumption with an empty battery

junction

junction

CO2 (test consumption)

junction

junction

Range

junction

4.1L S + 9.3kWh/100km

608 km + 60 km electric

4.2L S + 9.5kWh/100km

614 km + 50 km electric


The Opel is unbalanced when it comes to the chassis. Between dizzying swings on bumpy slopes and stubborn Stuckern on patchwork rugs, the Opel likes the extremely relaxed gait. Then the extremely smooth and synthetic steering is less noticeable.

At least the Kia has the more pleasant steering resistance, but it also provides little feedback. The Koreans have tuned the chassis tighter and more binding overall.

Price: In the test trim, the Opel is almost 7,000 euros more expensive than the Kia

Opel actually demands more than 50,000 euros for the Hybrid4, in the test trim the Grandland is almost 7,000 euros more expensive than the Sportage. When it comes to the guarantee, the Rüsselsheim-based company only dares for two years. As usual, Kia offers seven years, but calls for maintenance every 15,000 kilometers or annually (Opel: every 30,000 km/year).

Scoring and conclusion

1. Kia Sportage – 559 points: More space, more comfort and then also cheaper – the Sportage won’t let the victory be taken away.
2. Opel Grandland – Points 533: The extremely powerful drive cannot compensate for the weaknesses in comfort and space utilization; therefore only second.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button