Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV: endurance test – how-to-cars.com

–
A pioneer with a plug
This Mitsubishi can also be electric. 50,000 kilometers in the Outlander PHEV reveal strengths but also weaknesses.
Used car search: Mitsubishi Outlander
Consumption and range are the biggest weaknesses
Clean engine compartment: Under the hood, nothing indicates the elaborate plug-in technology.
On April 15, 2019, the, well, not permanent, but annual test started. In brilliant mother-of-pearl white, with lavish furnishings. Cost: 49,990 euros. Another extra on the price list is a GPS for 600 euros. But you can save yourself that is lame, cumbersome, not competitive. So Mitsubishi decided to give the testers Apple CarPlay and Google Maps instead. Drive, space and driving behavior are more important. This brings us to the impressions that the Outlander left. He can convince with his background noise. No trace of the roar of the combustion engine when accelerating like a Toyota Prius. Discreet in tone and behavior, it switches discreetly when necessary. Very pleasant. Like all of the noise insulation. This is matched by the well-damped, yet firm chassis, of which 18-inch bumps only penetrate on lousy slopes. Overall, the tall white is also recommended as a relaxed touring car with comfortable seats and plenty of space inside. And it reveals its greatest weaknesses on the road: consumption and range. Electrically, Mitsubishi specifies that it can cover up to 54 kilometers. We did 50 kilometers at the start of the test, but still 45 a year later. Okay for an empty weight of almost two tons, but not overwhelming.
Technical specifications | |
---|---|
engine | Four-cylinder, front across |
Displacement | 2360 cm3 |
power | 99 kW (135 hp) at 4500 rpm |
Max. Torque | 211 Nm at 4500 rpm |
Electric motors | one each on the front and rear axles |
power | front 60 kW (82 HP) / rear 70 kW (95 HP) |
Max. Torque | front 137 Nm / rear 195 Nm |
Max. System performance | 165 kW (224 hp) |
battery | Lithium ion |
capacity | 13.8 kWh |
drive | Four-wheel drive / automatic input |
Length Width Height | 4695 / 1800-2121 mm * / 1710 mm |
wheelbase | 2670 mm |
Track gauge | front 1540 / rear 1540 mm |
Curb weight | 1951 kg |
Payload | 439 kg |
Trailer load | 1500/750 kg |
Trunk | 463-1602 l |
top | electric 135 km / h – hybrid 170 km / h |
acceleration | 0-100 km / h in 10.5 s (factory setting) |
consumption | 1.8 l S (EU mix) |
Exhaust gas | CO2 46 g / km |
E range | 54 km |
* Width with outside mirrors |
The is developed Outlander PHEV for speed-limited streets
Cruise to 130 km / h and relax. Then consumption under nine liters is possible.
Tester Stefan Novitski locates the intended use as a “utility tractor for home and craftsmen without long-distance ambitions.” All others rely on the combustion engine at the end of the short electric route. But it is thirsty (9.8 liters super in the long-term test average, with sporty gait over 12 liters) – and the tank is small (43 liters). Nothing changes that Mitsubishi lets the gasoline engine work according to the Atkinson principle. Without going deep into engine technology, the gasoline engine should be curbed in terms of consumption and exhaust gas behavior. Which also robs him of performance. Conclusion by KLASSIK author Martin Puthz after 3000 kilometers: “The Outlander is economical only where I don’t need a heavy SUV with all-wheel drive, namely on short journeys in city mode.” You should understand this hybrid as its concept is designed: developed for speed-limited roads. Cruise to 130 km / h and relax. Then consumption under nine liters is possible. We tried: The three of us with lots of luggage from Munich to Hamburg, in many cars that would be a pain. The editors Branke and Klangwald as well as photographer Ruddies got out in Hamburg relaxed. Even in the back seat, the trip was not an ordeal. Two pit stops (small tank!) Were often used for coffee breaks.
costs | |
---|---|
Operating costs / guarantees (fixed costs per year | |
Liability 16 (100%, R 11) | 800 euros |
Fully comprehensive 23 (500 € SB, R 7) * | 1380 euros |
Partial comprehensive 25 (€ 150 SB, R 9) * | 163 euros |
Motor vehicle tax (Euro 6d-Temp-Evap-ISC) | 48 euros |
* current type classes: HPF 17 / VK 23 / TK 24 | |
Fuel cost for 50,371 km | |
4923.82 liter S (= 9.8 l / 100 km) | 6,844.11 euros |
485.3 kWh of electrical energy | 160.15 euros |
Inspection costs (including oil change) | |
20,000 km | 318.59 euros |
40,000 km | 466.13 euros |
Tire costs (including assembly) | |
1 set of summer tires 225/55 R 18 V Yokohama Blue Earth E70 | 600 euros |
1 set of 225/55 R 18 V Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV winter tires | 788 euros |
Prices / loss of value | |
Test car price 4/19 (including extras) | 49,990 euros |
Current new price (including extras) * | 50,990 euros |
Estimate 4/20 | 24,800 euros |
Depreciation of the test car | 25,190 euros |
Total cost for 1 year | |
to 50,371 km | 11,048.98 euros |
Cost per km | 0.22 euros |
Cost per km with depreciation | 0.72 euros |
There is nothing to complain about in terms of reliability
Conclusion by Manfred Klangwald: Mitsubishi has been building plug-in hybrid SUVs since 2003, which meant the Japanese were ahead of their time. The third generation is routine, easy and reliable. However, the pure e-range is no longer up-to-date, multimedia can do better.
Readings | |||
---|---|---|---|
At the start of the test | At the end of the test | ||
acceleration | acceleration | ||
0-50 km / h | 4.1 s | 0-50 km / h | 4.0 s |
0-100 / -130 km / h | 9.7 / 16.1 s | 0-100 / -130 km / h | 9.9 / 16.9 s |
0-160 km / h | 24.8 s | 0-160 km / h | 26.2 s |
Intermediate sprint | Intermediate sprint | ||
60-100 km / h | 4.7 s | 60-100 km / h | 5.1 s |
80-120 km / h | 6.6 s | 80-120 km / h | 7.1 |
Braking distance | Braking distance | ||
from 100 km / h cold | 37.9 m | from 100 km / h cold | 38.2 m |
from 100 km / h warm | 39.3 m | from 100 km / h warm | 38.1 m |
Interior noise | Interior noise | ||
at 50 km / h | 57 dB (A) | at 50 km / h | 57 dB (A) |
at 100 km / h | 64 dB (A) | at 100 km / h | 65 dB (A) |
at 130 km / h | 70 dB (A) | at 130 km / h | 70 dB (A) |
Test consumption | 8.8 l S – 11.2 kWh | Test consumption | 8.9 l S – 11.4 kWh |